Candyland lab report

Candyland clears 20% THC in 61% of 514 flower tests; 20% met or passed 25%, 3.1% met or passed 30%, and the median was 20.99%.¹

By the 20% mark, Nevada was ahead: 65% of 416 tests reached 20% or more, with a 21.14% median; Washington posted 59% of 58 tests reaching 20% or more and a 21.30% median.¹ That state difference folds in local cultivators, lab practices and testing regulations as well as the plant.

The one single THC figure we checked was below Candyland's lab median of 20.99%.¹ Leafly publishes 19%; at that cutoff, 73% of lab tests were at or above it.^1,3

For ranges, AllBud's 18–24% covered the largest slice, 58% of tests, while Grand Daddy Purp's 14–19% covered the smallest, 22%.^1,4,5

Those figures are outside summaries, not batch guarantees. For any specific package, the relevant document is that batch's certificate of analysis.

Candyland's dominant terpene is β-caryophyllene, though it does not lead every profile: it led 68% of 421 tests, ahead of limonene at 29% and α-pinene at 2.9%.¹

Leafly's terpene note points to caryophyllene; in our test-by-test count, β-caryophyllene led 68%, so the sources line up.^1,3 Nearly all terpene records came from Nevada, which supplied 416 of 421 tests, so these shares mostly reflect flower tested in that state.¹

Georgia Pie, Gushers and Tropicana Cherry share Candyland's terpene profile most closely, each with 93% overlap and a β-caryophyllene lead; the least similar strain in the 36-strain comparison is Durban Poison, led by terpinolene, at 33% overlap.¹

We start with median results for eight terpenes, convert them to each terpene's share of that strain's eight-terpene total, then compare the shared share between two strains; identical mixes score 100. The pool includes only strains with at least 30 tests reporting individual terpenes. This is a chemistry comparison, not a forecast of effects.

Yes, Candyland sits in the middle third for THC: its 20.99% median ranks 24th of 58 strains, just below Gelato at 21.58% and just above Gushers at 20.95%.¹ By the 25% cutoff, its 20% share also ranks 24th.¹

The middle half covers 18.84%–23.86%, a span of 5.02 points; among 52 strains with enough data, that spread is 25th-narrowest, so Candyland lands near the pack for consistency.¹

Yes, Candyland THC varies by lab within Nevada: the 3 labs with at least 20 Candyland tests differed by 4.93 points, and across the 4 labs with at least 20 tests the median ran from 19.33% at Lab D in Washington to 24.36% at Lab A in Nevada, a gap of 5.03 points.¹

The spread remains inside Nevada: the 3 labs with at least 20 Candyland tests differ by 4.93 points, from 19.43% to 24.36%.¹

Because labs receive flower from different growers, this spread should not be read as proof that a lab scores high; it reflects both cultivation and testing pathways. On this page lab names are masked, with Lab A representing the lab with the largest Candyland count; the downloadable test file gives the names.¹

Yes, higher-THC Candyland showed more total terpenes in the paired lab data: the highest-THC third (22.91% or higher) had a 2.25% median, versus 1.41% for the lowest-THC third (19.81% or lower).¹

Within states, only Nevada met the sample rule, and it matched the overall direction: 1.42% in the low-THC third versus 2.25% in the high-THC third.¹ Total terpenes are measured as aroma-compound weight; that measurement is not evidence about effects.

Yes, Candyland is testing about the same over time: median THC was 20.67% in 2018 across 28 tests and 20.05% in 2022 across 42, with an overall change of −0.62 points.¹

Within Nevada, the line is also flat: 2020 measured 20.19%, 2022 measured 20.15%, and the difference was −0.04 points.¹ We omit years below the 20-test cutoff.

Candyland is tested mostly as flower under the exact name: 536 of 716 records, or 75%, with shake and trim at 12%, concentrates at 12% and other or unrecorded at 1.4%.¹ For this site’s calculations, we keep the flower records and leave the other forms out.

The broader name search found 128 longer-name records, equal to 15% of all records containing Candyland; the largest were “Candyland Cookies” (56), “CandyLand F2” (15) and “CandyLand x F5F10” (13).¹ Because extra words, cross notation and CBD labels can indicate another product, those records stay outside the dataset; see our matching method.

Yes, Candyland costs less in Seattle; its menu presence was mid-pack too, with 78 store listings for its flower in the Oct 4, 2026 Weedmaps snapshot within 50 miles of the individual market centers, spanning 10 of 27 markets and ranking 32nd of 50 tracked strains.²

Price data cleared our filter in one market: in Seattle, the Candyland median for an exact eighth was $25.50 across 12 listings, versus $30.00 for the typical other strain on those menus across 11 rivals.² That made Candyland cheaper than the local comparison by $4.50.²